Resolving Particle Size Mixtures of Concentrated Samples Using Dynamic Light Scattering

Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) is a low resolution technique, however algorithms are available in the Zetasizer Nano S to resolve mixtures of suitable samples, in this case of latex standards at a 1% concentration

Introduction

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) is a non-invasive technique used for characterizing macromolecules in solution and particles in suspension. The technique measures the time-dependent fluctuations in the intensity of scattered light that occur because the particles are undergoing Brownian motion. The velocity of this Brownian motion is measured and is called the translational diffusion coefficient D. This diffusion coefficient can be converted into a hydrodynamic diameter (DH) using the Stokes-Einstein equation.

DLS is inherently a low-resolution technique with limited capability of resolving different sized particles in a distribution. However, distribution algorithms, such as Non-Negative Least Squares (NNLS) and CONTIN, do have the ability to distinguish between different size populations in a sample. Whether this is possible in a particular sample is determined by a number of factors including:

  • Relative sizes of the different populations present in the sample
  • Relative intensity of scattering from the different populations present in the sample
  • The polydispersities of the separate size distributions
  • Quality of the sample preparation
  • Quality of the data

As a test of the resolving ability of an algorithm, measurements can be done using mixtures of monosized latex standards prepared at different relative concentrations. This application note details measurements performed on a series of samples where the relative concentrations of different size latex standards were varied.

Measurements were made on mixtures of latex standards at neat concentration on a Zetasizer Nano S (173°).

Experimental

All latex standards used for the measurements discussed in this application note were obtained from Duke Scientific, Palo Alto, California, now Thermo scientific, Fremont CA, and were traceable to NIST, Gaithersburg, Maryland. Nanosphere™ size standards from the 3000 series were used. Specifically, these were the 60nm (catalogue number 3060A), the 220nm (3220A) and 900nm (3900A) standards respectively. All of these standards are supplied at 1% w/v concentration.

The analysis model used in the Zetasizer Nano software was Multiple Narrow Modes.

Results

The Zetasizer Nano S incorporates non-invasive backscatter optics (NIBS) that allows for the measurement of concentrated samples. Therefore, measurements of mixtures of 60 and 220nm latex standards at different ratios were made at neat concentrations of 1% w/v. Table 1 summarizes the results obtained for these measurements and contains the ratios of the 60 and 220nm latex mixtures, the z-average diameters, the polydispersity index values, the peak analysis of the intensity and volume size distributions obtained (peak modes and percentages). Conversions of the measured intensity size distributions into volume were done using Mie theory with particle refractive index values of 1.59 and particle absorption values of 0.01. The corresponding intensity and volume size distributions obtained for the various mixtures are shown in figures 1 and 2 respectively.


Figure 1a: Intensity size distributions obtained for 60nm latex standard
mrk1137 fig1a
Figure 1b: Intensity size distributions obtained for 220nm latex standard
mrk1137 fig1b
Figure 1c: Intensity size distributions obtained for 1:1 v/v mixture of 60:220nm latex
mrk1137 fig1c
Figure 1d: Intensity size distributions obtained for 2:1 v/v mixture of 60:220nm latex
mrk1137 fig1d
Figure 1e: Intensity size distributions obtained for 4:1 v/v mixture of 60:220nm latex
mrk1137 fig1e
Figure 1f: Intensity size distributions obtained for 12:1 v/v mixture of 60:220nm latex
mrk1137 fig1f
Figure 1g: Overplot of all the intensity size distributions
mrk1137 fig1g
Figure 2a: Volume size distributions obtained for 60nm latex standard
mrk1137 fig2a
Figure 2b: Volume size distributions obtained for 220nm latex standard
mrk1137 fig2b
Figure 2c: Volume size distributions obtained for 1:1 v/v mixture of 60:220nm latex
mrk1137 fig2c
Figure 2d: Volume size distributions obtained for 2:1 v/v mixture of 60:220nm latex
mrk1137 fig2d
Figure 2e: Volume size distributions obtained for 4:1 v/v mixture of 60:220nm latex
mrk1137 fig2e
Figure 2f: Volume size distributions obtained for 12:1 v/v mixture of 60:220nm latex
mrk1137 fig2f
Figure 2g: Overplot of all the intensity size distributions
mrk1137 fig2g

The z-average diameters obtained from the latex mixtures decreases as the concentration of 60nm latex in each mixture is increased. Conversely, the polydispersity index values increase as the percentage of 60nm latex contained in each sample increases.

Table 1: The results obtained for measurements of mixtures of 60 and 220nm latex standards at different ratios made at neat concentrations of 1% w/v. The table contains the ratios of the 60 and 220nm latex mixtures, the z-average diameters, the polydispersity index values, the peak analysis of the intensity and volume size distributions obtained (peak modes and percentages).
mrk1137 table_1

The measured volume ratios are in good agreement with the actual volume ratios of the latex mixtures.

Conclusions

Even though dynamic light scattering is a low-resolution technique, the results presented in this application note have shown that not only can different size particles be resolved, but changes in the relative concentrations of each size population can be monitored.

The non-invasive back scatter (NIBS) optics incorporated in the Zetasizer Nano S allows for measurements to be made on concentrated, turbid samples.

Additional Reading

[1] Dynamic Light Scattering: An Introduction in 30 Minutes, Technical Note

[2] International Organisation for Standardisation, International Standard ISO22412:2008, Particle size analysis, Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)

[3] Dahneke, B.E. (ed) Measurement of Suspended Particles by Quasi-elastic Light Scattering, Wiley, 1983.

[4] Pecora, R. Dynamic Light Scattering: Applications of Photon Correlation Spectroscopy, Plenum Press, 1985.

[5] M. Kaszuba, M.T. Connah, F. McNeil-Watson and U. Nobbmann (2007) Particle and Particle Systems Characterization 24, 159-162.

Login

Not registered yet? Create an account